I performed a non-admin closure of the debate as keep. User:Hipocrite posted on my talk page, saying this closure was incorrect, saying "PORNBIO is not nearly unanimous." After I performed the closure of this debate, Hipocrite taggedWP:PORNBIO as disputed. I have no problem with PORNBIO changing, but I do feel that the closure I performed was correct. I present the case for scrutiny (I would like to know if I'm wrong). JujutacularT · C16:21, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I already left a message to the user at their talk page asking them to expand on this. Perhaps we should close this without predjudice to relisting when the nom has something to say? I can't do that myself because I participated in the AFD. SpartazHumbug!12:24, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Somehow, out of a technical problem, my reason did not show up on my first attempt. But I am bringing this up here because there were 5 keeps and 4 deletes (considering that my vote was worded as "rename" but is meant as a keep). The arguments given for keep are more in-depth than the deletes and altogether put forth a stronger case. Dew Kane (talk) 04:00, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I attempted to contact the closing admin here with no success. I thought this would be the next place to bring the discussion before relisting. I have now relisted at FFD per your suggestion here --Chrismiceli (talk) 14:57, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.